Tulare County
Field Crop Notes (January 2000)

Disclaimer: This newsletter is geared towards a Tulare County audience and may not be applicable to other geographical areas.

Reprint freely with credit to: Field Crop Notes, Carol Frate, editor, a publication of the University of California Cooperative Extension, Tulare County.

UCCE Tulare County
Home Page
 
Alfafa, Dry Beans, Sugarbeets,
Forages, Oil Crops Program Page
 
Field Crop Notes
List of Issues

For more information contact: Carol Frate, Farm Advisor, cafrate@ucdavis.edu

In This Issue

Alfalfa Variety Yield Results from 1997-1999 Trial

For those who haven't planted alfalfa yet this year, the results from the University of California variety trial at the Kearney Ag Center near Reedley are reported in Table 1. For growers who plant in fall, this information is too late to help in the selection of varieties, but due to fall harvests and analyzing yields at each variety trial location, it is impossible to report this information any sooner.

These trials are based on small plots where there is limited wheel traffic over the plots. Yields are based on a green weight and then adjusted to 100% dry matter based on moisture samples taken during harvest. Results from experimental varieties are also included in this report.

Note that some of the varieties that are in the top 10 for the average of the 3 years were not in the top 10 in the first year of the trial (which explains our policy not to issue a report after just 1 year of harvesting a trial). Also note that the top 23 varieties are in the same statistical class meaning they are followed by an "A." This means that the differences between the yields of those varieties are too small to say with confidence that the difference is truly because one variety was better than the other. The difference may be due to chance.

A common question is, "Which variety has the highest quality?" Unfortunately the UC trials do not have the resources to collect and analyze for quality at each cutting. Several years ago they did collect quality data. Although there were a few differences among varieties at some cuttings, there was no consistent trend among varieties within a dormancy class. In general, if there are inherent differences in quality among varieties, at this time these differences are rather small and cutting schedules and management of harvest operations have more impact on final quality than variety selection.

Cutting on a shorter schedule should result in lower yields but higher quality. Repeated cutting on a schedule of less than 28 days for a dormancy 8 variety will result in reduced stands due to over- withdrawal of crown and root reserves. However, plants can recover if they are allowed a longer cutting schedule somewhere in the season. For example, cut on a 28 day schedule in April, May, and June. Then cut at 26 days in July and August, followed by 28-30 days in September and October. The plant will tell you when it is ready for cutting by producing new shoots at the base of the plant (regrowth). It is extremely important to look for regrowth in the September and October cuttings because that will tell you that you have allowed the plant to recover from any shortcomings during the summer.

Raking when the windrow is too dry is the best way to ruin quality. Baling too dry has also been shown to reduce quality but not as drastically as raking a dry windrow.

Influence on alfalfa quality of the time of day when swathing occurs has been a subject gaining research interest in recent years. All plants photosynthesize when the sun is out, and all plants respire during both daylight and nighttime conditions. During the day, photosynthesis (production of sugars and nutrients) outpaces respiration (the utilization of nutrients for making bigger molecules such as cellulose for cell walls). During the night when there is no photosynthesis there is a reduction in nutrients as they are used up by respiration but are not replaced. Research to date indicates a general increase of non-structural carbohydrates (which contribute to "TDN") in alfalfa during the afternoon and a lowering of percent crude protein (percentage wise if one component such as sugars increases, then at least one other component has to decrease because percentages add up to 100%). These increases of nonstructural carbohydrates do not always translate to higher percent TDN or lower % ADF when the alfalfa is cured and baled commercially. But if you are trying every angle to increase alfalfa quality on your farm, swathing in the late afternoon or early evening is one more practice you may want to try. For further information, refer to the articles in the 1998 and 1999 Proceedings of the California Alfalfa Symposium.

HOW TO ORDER SYMPOSIA PROCEEDINGS

If you are interested in ordering the 1998 or 1999 proceedings, please send a check for $10.00 each, payable to 'U.C. Regents.' Indicate which year you want and mail to CALIFORNIA ALFALFA SYMPOSIUM, Department of Agronomy & Range Science, University of California, Davis, CA 95616-8515. (There are also proceedings from other years.)

Table 1. Yield Summary for U.C. Kearney Alfalfa Cultivar Trial 1997 - 1999

UC Kearney Alfalfa Cultivar Trial 1997 - 1999 Yields. Trial planted 9/20/96.

Yield in Dry Tons/Acre

# Of
CUF 101 #
Entry
1997

 

1998

 

1999

 

Average
SW 9628 14.97 (09)   11.87 (01) 11.72 (02) 12.85 (01) A
115.0
WL 92-205 14.78 (17)   11.63 (03) 12.00 (01) 12.80 (02) A
114.6
SW 9500 (SW 9504) 15.38 (02)   11.46 (06) 11.09 (07) 12.64 ( 3) AB
113.2
SW 9301 14.78 (16)   11.78 (02) 11.20 (05) 12.59 (04) ABC
112.6
IK 9005 14.70 (22)   11.17 (13) 11.49 (03) 12.45 (05) ABCD
111.4
IK 9004 14.76 (18)   11.30 (09) 11.17 (06) 12.41 (06) ABCD
111.1
UC 2212 14.15 (37)   11.54 (05) 11.43 (04) 12.37 (07) ABCDE
110.7
Coronado 14.65 (24)   11.37 (07) 11.06 (08) 12.36 (08) ABCDE
110.6
UN1718 14.92 (10)   11.25 (10) 10.91 (11) 12.36 (09) ABCDE
110.6
Kern 15.19 (05)   11.04 (17) 10.84 (12) 12.35 (10) ABCDE
110.6
DS 681FQ 14.83 (13)   11.33 (08) 10.82 (13) 12.33 (11) ABCDE
110.3
UC 2269 14.83 (14)   11.22 (12) 10.92 (10) 12.32 (12) ABCDE
110.3
SW 7410 14.75 (19)   11.59 (04) 10.45 (20) 12.26 (13) ABCDEF
109.8
WL 612 14.98 (07)   11.08 (16) 10.64 (15) 12.23 (14) ABCDEF
109.5
Beacon (UN9B78) 15.11 (06)   10.95 (22) 10.48 (18) 12.18 (15) ABCDEFG
109.0
YS-8T1094 14.90 (12)   10.91 (24) 10.65 (14) 12.15 (16) ABCDEFGH
108.8
Magna 901 (DS 691) 15.59 (01)   10.86 (27) 09.98 (32) 12.14 (17) ABCDEFGH
108.7
YS9T78 14.97 (08)   11.12 (14) 10.33 (23) 12.14 (18) ABCDEFGHI
108.7
SW 7400 (SW 7411) 14.73 (20)   11.01 (19) 10.52 (17) 12.08 (19) ABCDEFGHIJ
108.1
IK 9206 14.59 (25)   10.98 (20) 10.55 (16) 12.04 (20) ABCDEFGHIJ
107.8
WL 525HQ 15.28 (04)   10.67 (33) 10.15 (26) 12.03 (21) ABCDEFGHIJK
107.7
FG92-301 14.42 (29)   10.62 (35) 11.03 (09) 12.02 (22) ABCDEFGHIJK
107.6
CW 4888 14.55 (26)   11.23 (11) 10.15 (27) 11.98 (23) ABCDEFGHIJKL
107.2
UC 2219 14.22 (35)   10.92 (23) 10.48 (19) 11.87 (24) ABCDEFGHIJKL
106.3
CW 4880 14.31 (32)   10.89 (25) 10.37 (22) 11.86 (25) ABCDEFGHIJKL
106.1
WL C245 14.92 (11)   10.58 (37) 10.04 (30) 11.84 (26) ABCDEFGHIJKL
106.0
WestStar (88SWR) 14.44 (27)   11.01 (18) 10.02 (31) 11.82 (27) ABCDEFGHIJKL
105.8
ZX 9392 14.25 (34)   10.81 (28) 10.14 (28) 11.73 (28) ABCDEFGHIJKLM
105.0
IK 9216-17 14.67 (23)   10.69 (31) 09.81 (34) 11.72 (29) ABCDEFGHIJKLM
104.9
UC 2241 14.32 (31)   10.87 (26) 09.78 (35) 11.65 (30) ABCDEFGHIJKLMN
104.3
Prestige 14.27 (33)   10.69 (32) 09.96 (33) 11.64 (31) ABCDEFGHIJKLMN
104.2
X56N57 15.29 (03)   10.38 (41) 09.23 (46) 11.63 (32) ABCDEFGHIJKLMN
104.1
DK 180 ML (FG8L412) 13.94 (38)   10.70 (30) 10.19 (25) 11.61 (33) ABCDEFGHIJKLMNO
103.9
ZX 9393 14.81 (15)   10.18 (44) 09.77 (36) 11.59 (34) ABCDEFGHIJKLMNO
103.7
90 KAS STX5 14.71 (21)   11.11 (15) 08.66 (51) 11.49 (35) ABCDEFGHIJKLMNO
102.9
WL 91-224 13.46 (47)   10.62 (34) 10.40 (21) 11.49 (36) ABCDEFGHIJKLMNO
102.8
ZX 9499 14.18 (36) 10.51 (39) 09.70 (40) 11.46 (37) ABCDEFGHIJKLMNO
102.6
CW 4890 13.89 (41) 10.52 (38) 09.77 (37) 11.39 (38) ABCDEFGHIJKLM
101.9
ZX 9499 A 13.41 (48) 10.70 (29) 09.74 (39) 11.28 (39) ABCDEFGHIJKLMNO
101.0
UC 2271 13.56 (44) 10.17 (45) 10.10 (29) 11.27 (40) ABCDEFGHIJKLMNO
100.9
Magna 9 13.50 (46) 10.96 (21) 09.35 (45) 11.27 (41) ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP
100.9
DK 189 14.44 (28) 09.84 (49) 09.51 (43) 11.26 (42) ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP
100.8
UC 2239 13.82 (42) 10.10 (46) 09.76 (38) 11.23 (43) ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP
100.5
CUF 101 14.32 (30) 09.98 (47) 09.22 (47) 11.17 (44) ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP
100.0
ABI 9283 13.27 (49) 10.59 (36) 09.53 (42) 11.13 (45) ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP
099.6
FG8L409 13.91 (39) 09.84 (48) 09.57 (41) 11.11 (46) ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP
099.4
5681 13.51 (45) 10.34 (43) 09.40 (44) 11.09 (47) ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP
099.2
Highline(UC 340) 13.89 (40) 09.67 (50) 08.90 (49) 10.82 (48) ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP
096.8
XA524 12.83 (50) 10.40 (40) 09.07 (48) 10.76 (49) ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP
096.3
Magna 8 13.81 (43) 09.62 (51) 08.72 (50) 10.72 (50) ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP
095.9
ST-8T198 10.39 (51) 10.36 (42) 10.33 (24) 10.36 (51) ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP
092.7
   
Mean 14.36   10.80  
10.22
  11.79  
 
     
CV 06.3   07.1  
0
8.4   5.8  
LSD (.05) 1.26   1.08  
1.20   0.91  
Variety X Year interaction is significant
Trial seeded at 25 lb/acre viable seed on Hanford fine sandy loam soil at the Univ. of Calif.
Kearney Agricultural Center, Parlier, CA on 9/20/96.
Entries followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 5% probability level according to Fishers (protected) LSD.


Silage Corn Trial Results

The yield results of the 1999 Tulare County silage corn trial are included in Table 2. Quality analyses are not yet completed and will be reported in a later newsletter.

In general, the weather last summer was very conducive to high corn yields. There were only a few very hot days that could have caused heat damage at pollination. The optimum maximum temperature for corn is 86° F so, even though we consider corn as a sun-loving crop, it does better when day and night temperatures are below 90°.

The Tulare County trial was well managed and fertilized. It did not receive pond water from the dairy. It was sprayed for mites with Comite.

Table 2. 1999 Tulare County Silage Corn Trial   
Cooperator: Garret DeJong         
Trial site: Avenue 136 and Road 168; Soil type: Cajon and Foster Fine Sandy Loams         
Harvester: Vercauteren Custom Harvesting, Inc         
Planted: May 27, 1999          
Harvested: September 20, 1999         
      Company

   Brand

Plant
Population
per
Acre

 Yield Summaries
 Plant
height
ft
 Ear
height
ft
 Tons/A 
as 
harvested
At Harvest
Moisture
%
Tons/A
adjusted to

70% Moisture
Asgrow  RX 938 30,920 cdef  40.1 a 72.1 a 37.3 defg 11.6 f 6.6 bcde
Novartis  NK 8214 32,920 ab  39.4 a 68.4 cdef 41.5 a 12.5 cde 6.6 abcde
Cargill  9027 (field variety) 29,950 fg  38.8 ab 69.0 bcde 40.1 abc 13.3 ab 6.1 def
Simplot  Big Max XL 28,280 h  37.0 bc 70.4 ab 36.5 fg 13.8 a 7.2 ab
Cal Valley  8681 31,450 cde  37.0 bc 69.4 bcd 37.8 cdef 12.2 def 6.1 def
SeedTec  ST 7838 30,080 efg  36.5 cd 67.6 def 39.4 abcd 13.2 abc 7.0 abc
Pioneer  32K61 31,140 cdef  36.1 cde 67.2 efg 39.5 abcd 12.8 bcd 6.0 ef
DeKalb  679 31,580 bcd  35.4 cdef 65.3 gh 41.0 ab 12.5 cde 7.3 a
Cargill  8327 32,080 bc  35.3 cdef 66.8 fgh 39.0 bcde 12.2 def 6.9 abc
AgriPro  9707 29,090 gh  34.8 defg 69.6 bc 35.2 g 12.0 ef 5.7 f
Gutwein  2696 33,690 a  34.5 efg 65.1 h 40.2 abc 12.2 def 6.6 bcde
Germain's - ABT  Hi Test 4138 34,050 a  34.0 fgh 67.5 def 36.9 efg 13.0 bc 6.3 cdef
Baglietto  5555 259,20 ii  33.0 gh 67.3 ef 36.0 fg 12.2 def 6.7 abcd
Mycogen  TMF113 29,920 fg  32.5 h 66.6 fgh 36.1 fg 13.4 ab 5.7 f
Farmers Warehouse  6481 30,280 defg  28.3 ii 66.5 fgh 31.6 h 12 ef 5.7 f
Coefficient of Variation %    2.67  3.1 1.7 3.89 3.4 6.3
LSD (0.05)    1372  1.8 2.0 2.46 0.75 0.68
average of all plots    30756  35.5 67.9 37.9 12.6 6.4
Values within a column followed by a common letter do not differ significantly at the 5% level of probability.         

Using Lagoon Water Nutrients for Crop Production

There will be two short courses conducted by UC Cooperative Extension on using lagoon water for crop production. Each short course consists of three sessions. The first short course has less detail, less problem solving worksheets and no test at the end. It is primarily geared for growers and dairy producers using lagoon water for irrigation. The second short course will have more hands-on problem sets and will end with a test. Growers, dairy producers or consultants can attend either short course. Certificates will be given to those attending all three sessions for either short course.

Short course #1
(Less intense - no fee.)

Session #1 Session #2 Session #3

Participants are strongly encouraged to bring a sample of undiluted lagoon water to the first class. A sample taken during an irrigation is preferable to a sample taken at the flush unless both share the same outlet. Samples may be submitted anonymously, with results reported by code number only. Keep samples refrigerated during storage and on ice during transport.

Short course #2
(Same topics but more detailed, exam at end; $12.00 fee/session to cover lunch.
Preregistration is required. Call (559) 733-6363 by January 24, 2000.)

Session #1 Session # 2 Session #3

Additional Workshops

Monitoring Wells on Dairies - Producers only

Siting and construction of monitoring wells on dairies; legal considerations; results of the Northern San Joaquin Valley monitoring well survey.

You must own or operate a dairy to attend this Monitoring Well Workshop. A similar session for crop consultants and others will be conducted on March 1, 2000.

Monitoring Wells on Dairies - Non-producers and producers welcome Using Excel Spreadsheets to Track Lagoon Water Nutrient Applications
Using a Palm Pilot Hand Held Computer for Lagoon Water Calculations How to Use the Colorimetric Ammonium Quick Test

For more information contact Carol Frate, UCCE Tulare County, (559) 733-6363.

Go to Top
 
UCCE Tulare County
Home Page
 
Alfafa, Dry Beans, Sugarbeets,
Forages, Oil Crops
Program Page
 
Field Crop Notes
List of Issues


University of California Cooperative Extension - Tulare County
Send comments to: UCCE Tulare County Webmaster
Revised: December 23, 1999