![]() Tulare County |
|
|
|
| Publ. # IG5-96 |
Good water management for San Joaquin Valley vineyards, the kind that's necessary for maximum production and quality, requires that adequate soil water be available for vine uptake. To accomplish this, growers must answer two questions: when to irrigate and how much water to apply.
In determining the amount of water to apply, both crop water use and the unavoidable losses during irrigation, mainly deep percolation of water below the root zone and runoff, must be considered. Generally, the magnitude of these losses, which is expressed as irrigation efficiency, depends on how uniformly water is applied to a vineyard. Therefore, it's related to the irrigation method. Even properly designed and managed irrigation systems have efficiency limitations and, on the average, drip and sprinkler are more efficient than furrow or border strip. Since it's both relatively difficult to estimate surface irrigation efficiency and unavoidable water losses can be sizeable, it's more difficult to use crop water use (ET) information for scheduling irrigation with these methods than it is for drip. The following discussion explains the factors that must be considered for scheduling irrigations for mature, surface irrigated vineyards. Examples are presented for typical soil types, rooting depths, and irrigation efficiencies.
One popular method of scheduling irrigations is based on knowing crop water use rates and the size of the soil water reservoir. With this information, we are able to replace the soil water before it reaches critical levels and, at the same time, not overirrigate.
Given adequate water, vine transpiration is the same for all soil types, but the amount of water that is stored in the profile and available for plant uptake is drastically different. This available water can be thought of as the difference between field capacity and the permanent wilting point. It's highest for clay soils and lowest for sands. Therefore, the soil type and depth of the root zone determine the "total available water content" in a given vineyard. Total available water can be thought of as the size of the soil water reservoir. However, we don't usually allow all of this water to be used between irrigations because adverse plant stress in vines occurs after 50 or 60 percent of the soil water reservoir is depleted.
Allowable depletion percentages depend on soil type. Table 1 shows typical values of allowable depletion, available water content and effective root zone depth for the following broad soil textural groups: sand, sandy loam, loam and clay.
Vineyard water use depends on the climatic conditions and the size and stage of development of the crop canopy. Young vineyards or those just leafing out in the spring have small canopies and, therefore, use less water than mature vineyards in the midsummer. Field measurements of vine water use indicate that there's less than 10 percent variation between long-term average ET and current season (real time) ET, so we used a 10-year average ET in the examples that follow.
Using typical conditions found in the San Joaquin Valley (Table 2) gives recommended irrigation amounts for each soil type and estimated irrigation efficiency. Using an irrigation efficiency of 50 percent for sand compared to 75 percent for clay indicates that half the water applied to sand is lost below the root zone, whereas only 25 percent is lost with the clay soil. Irrigation losses depend on soil texture, the length and slope of the run, water discharge rate (onflow) into and configuration of border or furrow, set time, and recovery and reuse of tailwater. Using the typical efficiencies shown in Table 2 resulted in application amounts for each irrigation of 4.6, 4.6, 5.0, and 5.1 inches per acre for sand, sandy loam, loam, and clay soils respectively. Also shown are irrigation amounts in units of gallons per acre to simplify calculating pumping time. For example, to apply 125,000 gallons per acre (4.6 inches) using a pump discharging 450 gallons per minute, 4.6 hours is required.
Irrigation dates are identified when cumulative ET since the last irrigation equals the amount of allowable depletion. Therefore, the larger the soil water reservoir, the less frequent are the irrigations. Figure 1 illustrates the relationship between soil type, irrigation dates, and the amount of water application for our hypothetical examples. Note that the number of irrigations per season ranges from 11 to 6, reflecting the influence of increasing available water from sands to clays. The fact that indicated amounts of applied water for each irrigation vary only modestly illustrates the relative inefficiency of surface irrigating sandy soils and the fact that high efficiency and water holding capacity are both usually associated with heavier soils. Indeed, the seasonal irrigation amount for the clay soil totals 31 inches, compared to 46 for the sandy soil.
Presented in this article are vineyard irrigation scheduling regimes for typical conditions found in the San Joaquin Valley. They were developed based on normal water use rates for mature vines and factors associated with different soil types. Indicated irrigation dates and amounts should, of course, be adjusted to accommodate the harvest. And as with any method of irrigation scheduling, verification (checks) of the accuracy should be made periodically through the season. Soil-based measurements, either by soil sampling with a soil tube, auger, or shovel, or with tensiometers, gypsum blocks, or other devices, would be appropriate.
Bill Peacock is a viticulture farm advisor and Dave Goldhamer is a water management specialist both with the UC Cooperative Extension.
| Textural class | Available water (in/ft¹) | Root zone depth (ft) | Allowable depletion | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage2 | Amount3 | |||
| Sand | 1.0 | 4.5 | 50 | 2.3 |
| Sandy loam | 1.6 | 3.5 | 50 | 2.8 |
| Loam | 1.9 | 3.5 | 50 | 3.5 |
| Clay | 2.3 | 3.3 | 50 | 3.8 |
| Textural class | Irrigation efficiency1 (%) | Allowable
depletion2 (inches) | Irrigation amount3 (inches) | Irrigation amount4 (gal/a) | Number irrigations per season | Total water applied for season (inches) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sand | 50 | 2.3 | 4.6 | 125,000 | 11 | 46 |
| Sandy loam | 60 | 2.8 | 4.7 | 127,000 | 8 | 38 |
| Loam | 70 | 3.5 | 5.0 | 135,000 | 7 | 35 |
| Clay | 75 | 4.8 | 5.1 | 138,000 | 6 | 31 |

|
|
|
|